Le coach du « 2e à Boston » explique les temps records

Renato Canova, un coach italien réputé qui entraine quelques Kenyans, a présenté récemment son analyse des temps incroyables qu’ont réalisé Geoffrey Mutai et son protégé Moses Mosop au marathon de Boston.

Son analyse est assez détaillée et elle met l’accent principalement sur les nouvelles méthodes d’entrainement, la jeunesse des nouveaux coureurs de marathon et le rôle de lièvre qu’à joué Ryan Hall pendant la course.

L’analyse complète est disponible sur le blog de course Let’s run.

1) In a course without rabbits, nobody supposed that one athlete (Ryan) could go from the start at so fast pace, without any mental inhibition. Ryan was wonderful as personality and as interpretation of the race, knowing his only chance is in a very fast but even pace. Of course, he didn’t know the potentiality of Geoffrey and Moses, and he tried his best. Without him,probably the race could be a normal competition, with a final time about 2:05.

2) Geoffrey and Moses never looked at the watch, so were not afarid about the speed because they didn’t want to know it. Honestly, we feared Gebremariam, and the tactic, involving Geoffrey, Moses and Robert Cheruiyot, was in any case to push very hard immediately after 30 km.

3) Without any mental conditioning, Geoffrey hammered in incredible way, running 28:24 between 30k and 40k. But wonderful was Moses, having a max gap of 8.0, never thinking to look for maintaining the second position only, but always concentrated on Geoffrey. His ability to stay in the race, in his first marathon, closing the gap after being 50m behind, was something really unbelievable (14:07 between 35 and 40k). And they were still able to finish last 2195m in 6:14 Geoffrey (exactly 2:50 per km) and 6:18 Moses (2:51.7).

4) They average was 2:55 per km, and this is possible only for athletes able running at the moment 10k under 27:00.

The reality is that Marathon is changing, with this type of athletes. Till 5 years ago, few athletes able running about 27:00 moved to marathon, and only when old, and no more to run faster than 27:30. The same Tergat (WR holder of 10000m in 26’27 ») moved to marathon when no more able to run faster than 27:10.

Instead, athletes like Geoffrey and Moses move to marathon WHEN ARE ABLE TO RUN 26:45. This fact provokes different effects :

a) These athletes are younger (so more fresh in their mind and their body) and faster than before

b) Their training changed. I use very high intensity for extensive workouts (for example, Moses ran 40k 3 weeks before Boston in 2:07:15, on rough road, start and finish in the same place, and heavy training shoes), and of course I need to give more days of recovery between one specific wokouts and the next one. In this case, Moses had the next training on track (10 x 1600m with 2′ recovery in 4’35 » / 4’32 » with the last in 4’17 ») exactly 6 days after his 40k.

c) Their level of intensity NEVER goes under 85%. This is a big difference, because in Kenya and Ethiopia the post-race behavior is to relax without doing any alternative training for rebuilding speed and muscle strength, so everytime the athletes prepare a new marathon they start again from a low level. Instead, Geoffrey using competitions, Moses using training, both of them maintain a high quality also short time after the marathon. We saw this last year with Geoffrey and Wilson Kiprop, this year with Mary Keitany.

d) Physiologically speaking, this type of athletes are able running a HM near 6 mml of lactate, and their marathon is near 4 mml. In other words, if till 5 years ago the best marathon runners were DIESEL ENGINES, now are TURBO DIESEL (whar already happened with Paula Radcliffe).

So, I really think that we don’t have to wait too long time for looking at the first 2:02, also if it’s difficult to have all the components favourable like in Boston this year.

At least, everything has a logic explanation, and to do wrong analysis for justifying something out of the normality is an exercise that has the only effect to create limits in the mind of the athletes, and excuses for their poor performances.

4 commentaires
    1. Je trouve son analyse très intéressante, mais c’est certain que le gars peut pas vraiment être objectif.. il coach le gars qui a fait 2h03min6s!

      D’ailleurs c’est mon cas aussi, PB de 7 minutes… la forme est meilleure, mais fallait que les conditions soient favorables!!!

  1. J’aime bien le « probably the race could be a normal competition, with a final time about 2:05 »

    Avant la course, le record du parcours était de 2:05:52 (2010 – Cheruiyot) et avant 2010 de 2:07:51 (1986 – Castella) J’ai hâte de voir l’année prochaine combien il y aura de sub 2:05!